While Intel and AMD both support DDR4\5 at this point within their memory controllers, PCIe 3.x\4.x\5.x is handled inside of AMD's IO while Intel offloads much of that to the chipset, only supporting some lanes inside the CPU, and many CPU's not supporting 5.x. ![]() If we were to try comparing fruits, AMD's PPT would be comparable to Intel's TDP + chipset (Z690 is 6-watts) + other external components that would otherwise be integrated in a Ryzen IO but as these architectures are vastly different a direct comparison is impossible for example, AMD's IO is far more complex than Intel's, supporting a wider range of platform designs and IO types. The TDP designation in AMD CPU's applies to the CPU portion of the package ie ZEN core chiplet(s) while the IO CCD is rolled into the PPT as it is effectively the rest of the "platform." Samus - Wednesday, Janulink Intel and AMD have dramatically different packaging.The Ryonce again bridges the gap between the other two Ryzen 7000 65 W SKUs.ĭespite not offering world-beating levels of performance, all three chips are running with a 65 W TDP and given the results, even the Ryperforms above our expectations here. The Ryoffers the highest levels of performance (as expected), with the Rybeing one of the slowest chips we've tested so far since we updated our test suite for 2023. EncodingĪs we saw in our rendering tests, the same thing can be said about performance in encoding. The Ryalso performs well, but with just 8C/16T, and at 65 W, it basically bridges the gap directly in the middle between the Ryand the Ryzen 5 7600. The real surprise is how well the Ryperforms, as it is consistently better than the previous generation Ryzen 9 5950X, and even trades blows with the Intel Core i9-12900KS processor in quite a few tests. Meanwhile in the multi-threaded test, it is blown away by the parts with 10 cores and above. Even in terms of CineBench R23 single-threaded performance, it sits below Intel's 12th Gen Alder Lake chips (albeit in a very packed field). ![]() Renderingįocusing on rendering performance, the entry-level Rystarts to fall behind in comparison to the other SKUs. We are using DDR5 memory on the 12th and 13th Gen Core parts, as well as the Ryzen 7000 series, at the following settings:Īll other CPUs such as Ryzen 50 were tested at the relevant JEDEC settings as per the processor's individual memory support with DDR4. In the encrypt/decrypt scenario, how data is transferred and by what mechanism is pertinent to on-the-fly encryption of sensitive data - a process by which more modern devices are leaning to for software security. This covers two main areas: encryption/decryption for secure data transfer, and video transcoding from one video format to another. One of the interesting elements of modern processors is encoding performance. ![]() Most benchmarks in this case are re-run several times, and the key to this is having an appropriate idle/wait time between benchmarks to allow for temperatures to normalize from the last test. If a system is not properly configured to deal with the thermal requirements of the processor, the rendering benchmarks are where it would show most easily as the frequency drops over a sustained period of time. These tests are some of the most strenuous in our list, due to the highly threaded nature of rendering and ray-tracing, and can draw a lot of power. All the tests put out some sort of score or time, usually in an obtainable way that makes it fairly easy to extract. Rendering tests, compared to others, are often a little more simple to digest and automate. CPU Benchmark Performance: Rendering And Encoding
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |